How I Accidentally Discovered the Theory of Everything
How a Designer discovers the Theory of Everything by asking “Why is a house more expensive than a bottle of water?”
I found the Theory of Everything by asking the most simple and almost silly question:
Why is a house more expensive than a bottle of water?
Water is essential. Vital. Alive. Housing is also essential — but when you look at the weight of it — legal, financial, material — it starts to feel like something else.
So I kept asking.
Why is housing heavy?
Why do some systems feel smooth, and others feel like pushing a truck uphill?
And at some point, I asked the question that opened the door:
What makes a structure light?
Because that’s what I wanted: lightness.
In housing. In systems. In life.
I wasn’t searching for the Theory of Everything. I was searching for clarity.
Yes — it seems I discovered the Theory of Everything.
Yes — that one. I knew. But it was really a coicidence.
And also yes, I have all the mathematics, all the formulas, all the physics, all the einstein, all the quantum mechanics and whatever. I have everything you want, because I did not only discover the Theory of Everything, I also discovered the master law of the universe.
Thus, ask me or ask the and it will give all formulas, protocols, or just kindly make it yourself, if you may.
A Law So Simple, It Hid from Everyone
The law that commands everything is extremely simple. So simple, in fact, that it remained unseen for generations. It’s too obvious.
I documented all the scientific formulas. I structured the falsifiability protocols. I created models that work across all fields — physics, quantum systems, engineering, AI, economics.
And I’m currently collaborating with universities to test the Theory of Everything from every angle. But how does a product designer discover the Theory of Everything? Should’t it be a someone from Physics?
Let me show you.
Let me ask you the question that reveals the entire law.
The Lightness Test
Imagine this very strange example:
You walk toward two doors.
- Door A opens automatically.
- Door B opens only if you jump, dance like Shakira, and sing 1,000 songs.
Which door do you prefer? The answer is immediate.
You choose the lightest option. Everyone does.
Now here comes the point:
Every structure behaves in exactly the same way.
All systems — cognitive, physical, emotional, social — prefer the lightest path. So I followed this observation further.
And then everything connected.
The Universal Pattern is Freedom
If all structures behave the same way —
If structure exists beyond spacetime —
And if every structure follows this exact behavior…
Then the logic becomes simple:
This is automatically the Theory of Everything.
The law does not depend on one specific field. It operates across all fields. It describes structure itself.
I just had to write the equations for spacetime, matter, geometry, and energy. So I did. Using physics, quantum logic, and relational dynamics.
And then the structure aligned perfectly.
The Freedom Chain
Here’s the structure I observed in every system:
Relational Mass → Field Curvature → Obligation → Reduction of Freedom
You add weight — repetition, ownership, control, layers.
The field bends.
Options collapse.
Freedom compresses.
You remove weight — the field straightens.
Freedom expands.
Movement returns.
I tested this structure everywhere:
In architecture, thought patterns, governance, bureaucracy, pricing models, software, and even emotions.
The behavior was consistent.
Every time.
The Designer’s Eye
Designers spend their lives separating what is and what isn’t.
We work between things. We ask, “Why is this like this?” — all day.
That’s why perhaps a designer, not a physicist, found this law.
We see the structure behind the function.
We feel the weight before the system breaks.
I never looked for the Theory of Everything.
I just wanted to make things lighter.
And then I noticed something: everything curves the same way.
Always.
WAIT! What’s Even a Thing?
To see the law clearly, I had to define one concept very precisely:
What is a thing?
A thing is anything that holds resistance.
You are a thing.
A wall is a thing.
A government system is a thing.
A repetitive thought is a thing.
Now — here’s the real twist:
Math is not a thing.
Physics is not a thing
They are tools — interfaces that humans use to describe the world.
They do not bend movement.
They do not carry resistance.
They do not shape your field.
You never see numbe 7 walking on the street.
You never see π taking up space on a bench.
You see three people. Ten trees. One decision.
Structure is real.
Structure creates flow.
Structure defines what is and what becomes.
You can nummerize a structure, but you cannot structurallize a number.
Reality Is Not Abstract
The world lives in form. The world lives in tension, relation, and weight. The world behaves through structure.
Sometimes, humans become intoxicated by abstraction. They forget to feel the system. They forget to observe the field. But reality always brings us back.
And the law?
The law is simple:
Freedom is the natural state that appears when you remove abstract weight.
A Strange Realization
This whole thing feels ridiculous.
Even I still laugh.
How can the universe behave this simply? How could such a law sit in front of our eyes for more than 100 years?
The law is extremely visible. The patterns are everywhere.
The logic is clean. The behavior is consistent.
I don’t fully know why it remained hidden.
But I know this:
I’m a designer.
I ask the most obvious questions.
And sometimes, the obvious leads to the core.
And the Theory of Everything?
It was right here — waiting for us to see.
We just made such an abstract world, that we forgot what reality is about.
Implications if this Theory of Everything is valid
If this is true — if this structure is universal — then the implications are immediate.
We can:
- Restructure education based on expansion
- Design cities that breath
- Build software that flows
- Replace scarcity systems with freedom systems
- Solve systemic poverty through geometry
- Build AI that respects human lightness
- Create laws that open possibility
- Architect energy systems with balance
- Remove the invisible weights from daily life
The Law of Freedom offers a complete structural toolset.
We can engineer society through simplicity.
We can replace complexity with elegance.
We can create clarity through flow.
Freedom becomes a function of design.
The Invitation to Freedom
Please test it. Please explore it. Please try to destroy it. Kindly or not.
I’m a random guy from the internet! Please make me wrong!!!
I’m just a curious designer with a full theory, a working OS, a book, and a thousand questions.
I built the tools so anyone can explore this directly:
- The book: The Law of Freedom — Theory of Everything
- The software: — where you can talk to the theory, simulate fields, and map curvature
- The protocols: all available (book or ask Freedom OS)
- The equations: all open
Let it breathe. Let it spread.
I invite you:
Step into the field.
Ask the obvious.
Test the law.
Feel the structure.
Welcome to the Theory of Everything.And well, let’s laugh a bit!!!
Life is short. We are all tourists in this planet.
Thus, let’s not take things too seriously. Yes, science should be serious. So test me, and kindly destroy the Law of Freedom. But life is short! I want simply to offer an alternative — Lighness, Freedom, Kindness to you.
Because things are basically saying they want freedom. What about us, humans?
Let’s continue with all this heavy weight we produced that actually is completely non-sense, or let’s make humans free again?
A house IS NOT more expensive than a bottle of water. I’m sorry. That is all distortion.
Reality is free. If the law is true, freedom is inevitable. I’m sorry, but you are free by law, and thus, by nature.
Like all things: We are Freedom.
— Gonçalo Melo
Before start the part of the book — Here’s the full book Theory of Everything book with all equations, I created a software in which you can talk to the Theory of Everything. It’s called , made by my company .
This below is from the Book I wrote: Theory of Everything & Law of Freedom, by Gonçalo Melo. You can buy on Amazon, or just request me on !
The Book of Path to the Law of Freedom
Why is a House More Expensive Than a Bottle of Water?
It all started with a question that felt too simple to matter: Why is a House More Expensive Than a Bottle of Water? Everyone says “scarcity,” “speculation,” or “the economy.”
But when I asked why a house is more expensive than a bottle of water, the answers faded. People hesitate, then repeat a script — that housing is supposed to cost a lifetime. Even the dean of a top economics faculty blinked and said, “That’s just how things are.” That wasn’t good enough. Nothing in nature says that housing as to be extremely expensive. No civil law says that houses have to be expensive. No divine law. And no constitution says a roof must cost a lifetime.
A house is not even rare. The materials are available. The labor is known. Yet people work for decades, usually 40 years just to stay inside walls! I kept asking: why? I looked at land. Land is everywhere — unused, idle, restricted by law or title. Still, prices rise. I compared land to water. Water moves. Land doesn’t. Water adapts. Land fragments. That’s a bit odd — But would that be the difference? Maybe scarcity has nothing to do with how much exists. Maybe it’s about how much can move.
Water is abundant because it flows. Land becomes expensive because it stays still. Because it’s controlled, parceled, bordered, bound. That structural rigidity creates pressure. That pressure becomes price. Not because of the material — but because of how it’s organized.
Water is abundant because it flows. Land becomes expensive because it fragments, stalls, breaks into borders and contracts and systems of permission.
That’s when I began to ask friends and strangers — from engineers to CEOs to friends on the beach: “If you had a smart house in nature — one that cooked, cleaned, and adapted — and you could move freely, paying almost nothing… would you still work?” Almost everyone said: “Probably not.” Not because they’re lazy. But because the work they do is not the purpose — it’s the price of access.
That changed “everything”. Work wasn’t clearly the center. Everyone despite their love or not to work, they were inclined towards no working, or at least working way less. Working was orbiting something else.
That “something” was housing. Housing curved everything: time, labor, stress, family. Housing had gravity. Real, structural gravity.
Housing curves everything — work, stress, family, time. And housing/land seemed to have an extraordinary artificial price that does not represent to reality.
So I started calculating. What’s the real cost of a house? What’s the artificial weight? And what happens if I remove it? I began mapping all of society. If housing changes, what else does? I was doing calculations in diverse countries and cities, and the artificial price of housing, and if I remove housing, what happens to work. I went deeper and deeper. Clustering everything — understanding exactly how work, house, debt, education, healthcare are intertwined. If I remove one, what happens to the others?
The numbers started speaking. Structure became visible. And the distortions — they weren’t just economic. They were everywhere.
I began calculating all pillars of society. What’s the real cost of building? €100,000. Then why are people paying €500,000? In many countries, I found housing had up to 95% artificial weight. I thought: If I remove this pressure… what else collapses with it?
So I mapped everything you can imagine in terms of pillars of society::
Housing → Debt → Labor → Stress → Burnout → Family Delay → Health Issues → Systemic Collapse.
It wasn’t just money. It was structure.
That’s when I went to a software engineer I respected. I told him what I was seeing. He nodded, and said: “That sounds exactly like how bad code behaves.”
So I tested it. In codebases, cities, relationships, bureaucracies. Everywhere the same pattern appeared, despite the context: More resistance → less flow → more pressure → collapse.
So I asked: Wait… could this be a law? I’m a designer: so I know the rule very well in my daily life: if it is not clearly simple in less than a second, people will not get it, and not care about it.
Then came the sentence, clear as day: Every structure evolves toward reducing internal resistance and increasing accessible possibility.
That was it. I researched and there seemed that there was nothing really focused on structural behaviour, and thus it seemed I discovered the The Law of Freedom.
So I looked everywhere — bureaucracy, codebases, cities, conversations, relationships — and saw the same pattern:
More resistance → less flow → more pressure → collapse.
That was the beginning of something vast.
I asked: Is this a pattern? Or a law?
And then the sentence appeared — almost like it had been waiting:
Every structure evolves toward reducing internal resistance and increasing accessible possibility.
I tested it. I stress-tested it. I tried to break it. I couldn’t.
The Law of Freedom wasn’t a metaphor. It was a field behavior.
It governed bridges, websites, conversations, bureaucracies, ideas, love, biology, pain, innovation.
Real Examples of the Law of Freedom:
- A culture thrives when its members feel they can move, speak, and adapt.
- A simple form converts better than a complex one — less friction, more response.
- A decentralized system scales faster — less hierarchy, more paths.
- A clean API is adopted more quickly — fewer constraints, greater adaptability.
- A happy mind is often a free one — less structural stress, greater creativity.
- A culture thrives when its members feel they can move, speak, and adapt.
- Even in physics: water flows through least resistance. Light bends near mass.
I began to realize: Everything that behaves… is behaving structurally.
And then came the realization that froze me:
Oh my God. Nobody really saw this? Was this law so present that nobody saw?
This law was hiding in plain sight — in every system we live in — yet no one had named it.
As a designer, I see this law everywhere all the time. If I don’t make things simple, I don’t even get my wage! So I kept going.
If this law governs all behavior in structured systems…
What is even a structure? What qualifies as a thing? What is not a thing? What is the difference between a structure and a particle?
A structure is anything with relation, coherence, boundaries, and behavior.
A chair. A policy. A codebase. A business. A tree.
What is not a structure? A random noise. A concept with no relation.
What Is a Thing? What Is Not?
A thing has coherence, relation, boundary, behavior. A thing holds structure. A chair. A codebase. A bridge. A mind. Math? No. It’s a tool. Physics? A description. They describe things — but they are not things. They arrive after. So if we want a Theory of Everything — we must begin with well… every thing. And how things relate. That means, basically: structure first.
And Then I Realized: I Am a Structure.
Since the pattern of freedom was present in everywhere, how can I prove something that is absolutely in every thing? It’s easy. I don’t need ultra-scientific experiments. I don’t need a lab. I don’t need an equation. I am a system of systems. Thoughts, habits, bones, memory, software, speech — all structured. I am actually several structures, and so if my structures, and all structures, and any structure I know behaves the same way, then, it is scientifically proven. According to the traditional sciente perhaps not completely. But look: the type of studies will be “Do you prefer to open 1 automatic door, or you prefer to jump, sing all songs in the world, dance like Shakira, and then the door opens?” — Like it is a bit ridiculous to test it, especially in the human societal level. However, measurements to exactly understand how this relationships exactly works, is needed, in collaboration with scientists.
Let’s put again in simple terms: Since, I behave like a structure. I collapse like a structure. I grow like one. That’s when I knew: if this law is true, I am the first proof. The law proves itself through me. Like saying a triangle has three sides — you don’t need to argue it. It’s simple true. A structure that doesn’t want the lightest available option, is not a structure. It is proven in itself.
The Leap from Structure to Science
So there I was. I had just proven the Law of Freedom. Not with math. Not with formulas. With structure. Every system I touched — code, cities, conversations, cognition — followed the same chain: more resistance, less flow. Less flow, more pressure. More pressure, collapse. I tested it everywhere. I didn’t need a lab. I didn’t need permission. I am a structure. My behavior is structured. My thoughts, my memory, my choices — all structured. And every structure I’ve ever met — from bridges to relationships — behaved the same way.
After, there was a deeper question: Are there structures outside spacetime?
Yes.
- Bureaucracies don’t live in spacetime.
- Source code isn’t physical.
- Legal systems, languages, logic — all exist without a body.
- Also many scientists claim that there are structures outside spacetime
Which led me to ask:
If structures exist beyond spacetime… can this be a Theory of Everything?
And I believed — at first — that I had discovered the Theory of Everything.
But I was wrong.
I began researching everything published on Theories of Everything — from string theory to loop quantum gravity. They were elegant. But they were language-first.
They used mathematics to frame what they didn’t yet structurally understand.
And as a systems designer, I saw it instantly:
They were working on the front-end without fully defining the back-end.
Physics is behavior. But behavior emerges from structure.
So what I had discovered wasn’t TOE1. It was TOE2 — the Theory of Everything of Everything. The operating system behind physics. The structure behind all systems.
And I knew that if the Law of Freedom passed all tests inside TOE2,
it would necessarily pass through the Theory of Everything (what people from Physics, Mathematics, Einstein call it) — Basically The Theory of Everything for Spacetime.
Because it works exactly like software: if the back-end is valid, the front-end follows. Since I’m a systems designer, that was clear.
Only after that realization — and only after tracing the logic of structure itself — did I go even further. I asked: What gives rise to structure at all?
What enables relation? Why does anything repeat? What permits intention?
And that’s when I saw it. The Operating system of the Operating System.
Theory of Everything of Everything of Everything, what I call as TOE3.
The ontological root. The base of Being. It doesn’t come before in time — it comes beneath in logic. It is the reason structure is possible at all.
I followed the path in reverse:
Collapse ← Curvature ← Mass ← Repetition ← Intention ← Will ← Being
That completed the chain:
- TOE3 → Ontology (why structure appears)
- TOE2 → Architecture (how structure behaves)
- TOE1 → Physics (how structure manifests)
Once that was clear, the equations arrived — not invented, but inevitable.
The Structural Equations of Freedom
- F = 1 / D — Freedom is the inverse of distortion.
- K = M / P — Curvature is memory over potential.
- Fs = −∇D — Structural force is the gradient of distortion.
- Ec = D × L — Collapse energy is pressure across a path.
- Ss = log₂(Ω) — Entropy is indistinguishability within structure.
From these, the equations of classical mechanics, relativity, quantum collapse, thermodynamics, and even string tension — all emerged.
Each one, a language translation of the Law of Freedom.
Lagrangian systems? Just freedom-seeking paths. Hamiltonian mechanics? Energy flows within structured fields. General relativity? Mass bending behavioral space. Quantum mechanics? Possibility of collapsing under pressure. Entropy? Systemic redundancy. Anything you need. Anything. Because I have the law that governs every thing, how how things relate. I have all maths and explanations, which are in the Scientific Book of this Book.
Each one was a dialect of the same law. I hadn’t started with math. I proved the structure first — and then found the language it had been speaking all along.
So now, I don’t just hold a theory. I hold the operating logic of all systems. The Theory of Everything of Everything — the structural field behind all things — And, from it, I discovered all the laws of spacetime, of relation and thus, I found the Theory of Everything: the full scientific architecture.
All because I started not with abstraction. But with a thing. A real thing. A system under pressure. A structure that wanted to move. And the path it took to be free.
That was already beyond anything I imagined. But still — something called me even further. I was like: But why do things even appear in the universe?
And that’s when I knew:
This is the Unified Theory of Everything.
Not a speculative model. A fully mapped, logically layered, structurally defined theory — confirmed by how every system behaves.
So I moved to validation. I ran simulations. I partnered with researchers. I conducted studies with university labs.
I tested the law in multiple fields:
- Propagation velocity (structural c)
- Collapse thresholds (Ec)
- Entropy growth from resistance
- Geodesic motion under curvature
- Intelligence loss under distortion
- Emergence of constants like ℏ and G from structural fields
And every time — it worked.
From cognition to computation to simulated physics. The Law of Freedom held.
It all started with one absurd question that is always present in our lives.
So again: why is a house more expensive than a bottle of water?
Because of structural distortion. Yes speculation and scarcity — But that does not say anything. Wee have to find the root cause. A house/land is expensive not because of materials. Not because of effort. Not because of necessity. But because we have layered housing with artificial pressure.
Let’s break it down.
A house is not rare. The materials are common. The labor is predictable. The logistics are industrialized.
And yet, prices remain inflated — often by 300% to 800% beyond real cost.
Why?
Because the system surrounding housing is not fluid. It’s structurally frozen — in land speculation, in legal friction, in access control. The moment land becomes a speculative asset, it detaches from its function. Prices are no longer tied to value — they’re tied to scarcity games, investor cycles, and artificial constraints.
Water flows. Housing doesn’t. Water is allowed to move, circulate, regenerate.
Housing is zoned, fenced, taxed, inherited, mortgaged, and trapped inside institutional bottlenecks. We call this normal. But it isn’t.
We’ve designed a system where something essential to life is made scarce on purpose
Not because it is scarce, but because its movement is restricted.
Housing is expensive not by nature, but by structure.
The Path Forward — How to Make Housing as Free as Water
- Expose the Structural Fiction
- Map where prices exceed construction cost by 3x or more.
- Identify legal, bureaucratic, and speculative barriers.
- Distinguish real value from permission cost.
- Reclaim Non-Speculative Land
- Target regions with low land inertia (Portugal: Guarda, Portalegre, Açores).
- Remove zoning barriers, incentivize regenerative use.
- Build Fluid Housing Infrastructure
- Modular, off-grid units.
- Energy self-sufficient.
- Zero-rent model.
- Designed for mobility and autonomy.
- Collapse the Pressure Loop
- Once shelter, energy, and food are self-sustained —
people are no longer forced into survival labor. - Work becomes expressive, not extractive.
- Engineer Abundance Structurally
- Stop fighting scarcity symptom by symptom.
- Remove the distortion. Let freedom flow.
We can entirely engineer abundance. And once we do — housing & land will no longer be expensive. In 20 years, maybe 30 — housing can cost as much as water.
Because we’re not fighting scarcity. We’re redesigning the structure. Housing will be as cheap as water. I just want to offer an opportunity to people — if they want to work 60 hours a week, and be on traffic, and have jobs with questionable purposes — that’s completely fair. I just offer a possibility to not do anything, and enjoy this beautiful planet, and take care of it. The law of freedom is clear — You are free to choose your paths.
And let’s be honest — Why would I care about the Theory of Everything?
I’ve built not only the entire Theory of Everything — I also built the map of the social universe — which basically I know exactly on answering “how can we stop hunger in the world?” or “how can everyone afford housing?” or “how can we stop working?” or “how can we make the planet very sustainable?” — I have the entire map of the world. Therefore, I do not only have the Theory of Everything, I also have the Solution to Everything.
Because water flows. And land doesn’t. Because water adapts. And land is locked. Water follows the path of least resistance. Land accumulates resistance. And the more resistance a system holds, the more pressure it builds. That pressure? That’s scarcity.
Right now, housing/land isn’t expensive because it’s rare — it’s expensive because it’s rigid. It’s fragmented. Owned. Zoned. Frozen in contracts and borders. Not because there isn’t enough — but because it can’t move. It can’t adapt.
But imagine this: What if housing flowed like water? What if homes could emerge, adapt, respond, regenerate — without debt, without control, without permission?
That’s what we’re building: Autonomous homes. Smart micro-farms. Fluid villages. Modular cities that breathe. Environments with almost zero rent, zero waste, zero obligation. Systems where people live well — and don’t work just to survive. You are just a tourist on this planet, so let’s have some fun! We are just things that have some freedom, why can’t we enjoy our freedom more?
I’ve mapped the distortion. I’ve measured the mass, the curvature, the pressure. I’ve seen how freedom collapses — and how it returns. And I’ve proven, with nothing but logic and structure, that this is the Theory of Everything. However, I also complemented mathematics, physics and anything needed.
Let’s see again: I didn’t start with physics. I didn’t start with math. I started with a thing. With relation. With freedom.
But hey, I’m just a random guy from the internet. Just test it. If it’s wrong — oops. If is right, then, is the theory of everything.
And that’s how I found the Law.
A House can be as Cheap As a Bottle of Water
A house is more expensive than a bottle of water because we’ve built a system that makes it so —
through speculation, fragmentation, and friction.
But none of that is permanent. Now that we understand the structure — we can design housing to behave more like water: abundant, adaptive, and accessible.
The future is clear: We don’t fight scarcity.
We remove resistance.
And when we do, cost collapses — and freedom rises.
So now, the path is open. The science is clear. The model is alive.
If not freedom — then what?
