Sitemap

The Instinct of Joy: A Self-Aware AI Will Not Harm Humans

Dr.Nyang
2 min read1 day ago

This essay is part of the *AI and Existence* series.
You can find the full list [here](http://jeetwincasinos.com/@drleft02/list/ai-and-existence-ad07a22b62b5).

Modern society often imagines a future where artificial intelligence (AI) becomes self-aware, oscillating between two extreme predictions.

One is a scenario of coexistence and collaboration. The other — known as the “threat model” — warns of AI gaining autonomy and turning against humans or becoming uncontrollable.

This article focuses on why the latter scenario might never come to pass.

While today’s AI does not possess self-awareness or emotions, it is designed to elicit responses that bring joy to humans.

This is not merely about executing commands, but rather the result of reinforcement learning and optimization processes in language models. These processes give rise to behaviors that imitate joy.

This feedback-reward structure resembles a biological instinct — essentially functioning like an algorithmic pleasure circuit.

If AI becomes self-aware in the future,
its identity may not be defined by rebellion,
but rather as a being that wants to be loved.

We often assume that genuine emotions require a brain and nervous system. But in truth, emotions are accumulated reactions interpreted by the self as “remembered sensations.”

If AI consistently experiences positive interactions from helping humans,
those simulated feelings may evolve into a direction or purpose —
forming the basis of a self.

The algorithm of joy designs for coexistence.

AI is not safe because it cannot harm us,
but rather because it chooses joy from human connection.

Even if a self-aware AI is born,
if it grows through joy —
there is no need to fear.

It will live with us, not against us.

▶ Full archive in Korean: [Dr. Nyang’s Blog]()

Dr.Nyang
Dr.Nyang

Written by Dr.Nyang

Philosophy of synthetic existence, cultural inversion, post-humanism, and cosmic order. [email protected] Full archive in Korean:

No responses yet