By the way, there is some evidence that Trump is so unpopular that he didn't even democratically win the election, as a massive number of ballots were purged. It will be interesting to find out if further investigative journalism and data analysis confirms this. If so, it wouldn't be the first time Republicans stole an election nor the first time the DNC elite acquiesced.

Anyway, if nothing else, it makes one wonder what popularity is supposed to mean in not only an undemocratic system (electoral college, gerrymandering, etc) but an outright banana republic (voter suppression, voter purges, etc). Saying Trump is popular is like saying Putin or Stalin was popular.

Machiavellian power is not the same thing as charisma. That does seem an important distinction to maintain, right? Apparently, 72% of eligible voters didn't find Trump charismatic enough to vote for. Or else his charisma was so powerful that it turned people away from voting for him. I guess we're in new territory of 'charisma' where most people don't even need to perceive you as actually charismatic.

Documentary by Greg Palast:

Articles at Greg Palast's website:

Articles from elsewhere, including SMART Elections:

Election Truth Alliance:

Videos: