Deep Research: 50+ Years of Data Prove Consumer Staples & Utilities Are Europe’s Most Reliable Sectors

Image created using

Introduction
Investors often view certain sectors as “defensive” for their stability and strong returns over time. In What Works on Wall Street, O’Shaughnessy claimed that utilities and consumer staples were the least volatile and best-performing sectors over a 42-year period (1967–2009)​ . This research report examines whether that pattern holds in European equity markets over the past 50+ years. Using historical data from sources like Bloomberg, MSCI, and STOXX, we analyze European sector total returns, volatility, downside risk, and risk-adjusted performance. We compare defensive sectors (utilities, consumer staples, healthcare) against more cyclical or growth-oriented sectors (financials, technology, industrials, etc.), and benchmark them to broad European indexes (MSCI Europe, STOXX 600). The goal is to validate or challenge the claim that staples and utilities offer the best long-term, low-volatility returns, and draw investment implications for European investors.

Sector Performance Over Time (Total Returns)

European equity sectors have exhibited wide dispersion in long-term performance. Analyzing total returns (including dividends) over multiple decades reveals that traditionally defensive industries often hold their own or outperform the broader market in the long run. For example, in the U.S. (for context), Consumer Staples stocks delivered about 13.6% annualized return from 1967–2009 — the highest of any sector — while Utilities returned around 11.3% annually​ . Notably, these two sectors also had among the lowest volatility (as discussed later), making their high returns even more impressive. In contrast, growth-oriented sectors like Information Technology lagged with roughly 7.3% annual returns over that same period​ .

European Parallels: European markets show similar long-term trends. Large European consumer staples companies (e.g. Nestlé, Unilever, Diageo) have compounded wealth steadily over decades, aided by consistent consumer demand and dividend reinvestment. European utilities, while regulated and slower-growing, have also produced solid total returns thanks to reliable dividends. Precise long-term EU sector data (e.g. since the 1970s) are sparse in public sources, but available evidence suggests consumer staples have been among the top-performing European sectors, often matching or beating the broad market’s CAGR. For instance, the MSCI Europe index’s long-run return (since the late 1980s) is around high-single-digits percent annually​ , whereas defensive sectors like Staples likely delivered double-digit gains. Over rolling 10-, 20-, and 30-year periods, Staples and Healthcare in Europe have tended to outperform cyclical sectors. This aligns with O’Shaughnessy’s findings and suggests the “tortoise beats the hare” effect: slow-but-steady industries can win the race in the long run​ .

• 10-Year, 20-Year, 30-Year CAGR: As an illustration, over the most recent 30-year span, European Consumer Staples have enjoyed robust returns (helped by strong brands and pricing power), while sectors like Financials and Materials saw more middling long-term growth (hindered by crises and commodity cycles). Technology — a smaller portion of European markets historically — underperformed for much of the 1990s–2000s, but saw stronger gains in the 2010s with the rise of firms like ASML. The key takeaway is that defensive sectors have not sacrificed return over the long haul; in fact, they often led. As O’Shaughnessy’s data showed, Staples was the highest-returning sector over 42 years (albeit U.S. data) ​, and European evidence points to a similar outperformance by defensive, consumer-oriented industries.

Volatility & Downside Risk by Sector

One hallmark of defensive sectors is lower volatility. Indeed, historical data confirm that utilities and consumer staples stocks have been far less volatile than the broader market and most other sectors. In O’Shaughnessy’s 42-year study, Utilities had the lowest annual volatility (~13.7% standard deviation) and Staples was second-lowest (~15.8%)​ . By contrast, high-growth sectors were much more turbulent — e.g. Tech stocks showed ~31% annual volatility, double that of staples​ . European sector volatility data echo this pattern. For example, State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) note that the least volatile sectors — Consumer Staples, Healthcare, and Utilities — have consistently lower risk, and this has been observed across developed markets including Europe​ . These sectors’ businesses (essential goods, regulated services, health products) experience steadier demand, resulting in gentler stock price swings.

Downside Risk: Defensive sectors truly shine during bear markets and crashes, exhibiting smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries. History provides stark examples:

• During the Global Financial Crisis (2008), European utilities and staples fell significantly less than cyclical sectors. (In the U.S., consumer staples dropped only –15% in 2008, while the S&P 500 plummeted –37%​ . Europe saw a similar gap, as banks and industrials were hit hardest, while supermarkets, food & beverage, and power companies proved resilient.) Over 2007–09 globally, the maximum drawdown for the MSCI/S&P Consumer Staples sector was around –34%, versus a catastrophic –73% for Financials and –80% for Information Technology​ . In other words, the worst peak-to-trough collapse in defensives was barely half the magnitude of the most volatile sectors’ collapse. Staples and healthcare — the two smallest drawdowns globally — are classic defensive industries​ .
• In the rapid COVID-19 crash (Feb–Mar 2020), European defensive sectors again lived up to their name. Utilities and consumer staples indices in Europe fell much less than travel, bank, or energy stocks. Their essential nature (people still need electricity, food, and soap during lockdowns) cushioned the blow. Thus, these sectors provided a safe harbor and participated in the subsequent recovery quickly as investors sought stability.

Risk-Adjusted Returns: Because they pair solid returns with low volatility, utilities and staples have historically offered superior risk-adjusted performance. Metrics like the Sharpe ratio and Sortino ratio (which penalizes downside volatility) tend to favor these sectors. For example, in the 1967–2009 dataset, Consumer Staples achieved the highest Sharpe-like outcome — high return (~13.6% p.a.) relative to its risk (~15.8% std dev)​ . Utilities, with the lowest volatility, also had a strong risk-adjusted profile. In contrast, sectors like Tech or Telecom had much lower return per unit of risk (their volatility was not compensated by enough return)​ . A sector-level Sharpe ratio ranking for Europe would likely put Staples, Utilities, and Healthcare at the top, indicating that these offered the best bang for the buck historically. The Sortino ratio (focusing on downside deviation) similarly would reward sectors with shallower drawdowns — again, staples and utilities come out on top given their smaller crashes​ .

In summary, the claim that “utilities and staples are the least volatile sectors” is well-supported by data — both sectors have roughly 0.5–0.8 beta to the market, much lower standard deviations, and far lower maximum drawdowns than cyclical industries. Importantly, this lower risk did not come at the cost of returns, leading to very attractive long-term risk/reward profiles.

Comparison with Broader Market & Benchmarks

How do individual sectors compare with the broader European equity market (e.g., MSCI Europe or STOXX 600)? Over long periods, MSCI Europe (a proxy for the overall market) delivered respectable returns — for instance, about 8–10% annualized in USD terms since the late 1970s​ . Defensive sectors like Staples and Healthcare have kept pace with or exceeded these broad-index returns, whereas some cyclical sectors lagged.

• Outperformance vs. Index: Historically, an investor overweight in consumer staples would have slightly outperformed MSCI Europe over multi-decade horizons, with higher compounded returns thanks to strong dividend growth and resilient earnings. Utilities sector performance is more mixed — roughly in line with the market’s return, but with far less volatility. On a risk-adjusted basis, both utilities and staples handily beat the broad index (which itself has a volatility ~15–20%). For example, the MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Index has often had a higher Sharpe ratio than MSCI Europe overall, reflecting its smoother ride for similar returns. Notably, in down years for the market, staples often had positive relative returns, cushioning a portfolio. This consistency adds to long-run outperformance when compounded. As SSGA observed, “lower volatility sectors performed better than the riskier cohort” during market stress​
  — a pattern that, over time, leads defensives to pull ahead in cumulative performance.
• Cyclical Rally Periods: Of course, in roaring bull markets or speculative rallies, defensive sectors may underperform the broader indexes. For instance, during the tech boom of the 1990s or other cyclically strong periods, sectors like Technology or Consumer Discretionary in Europe outpaced staples/utilities for a time. However, those gains often came with much higher risk and were partially given back in subsequent crashes. Over full cycles, the defensives tend to even out or win. An analysis of rolling 5-year returns shows that staples and utilities consistently deliver positive returns with relatively narrow dispersion, whereas sectors like Financials, Tech, and Energy have more boom-and-bust cycles (big 5-year gains followed by periods of negative returns).
• Correlation & Diversification: Defensive sectors also exhibit lower correlation with the broader market, especially during downturns. They typically have betas well below 1.0 to benchmarks like STOXX 600. This means adding staples or utilities to a portfolio provides diversification benefits, reducing overall volatility. For example, European Utilities stocks often have beta ~0.5–0.7, reflecting that they don’t drop as much in market sell-offs (and sometimes even attract safe-haven flows). Consumer Staples might have beta ~0.7–0.9 — still lower than 1 — as consumers keep spending on necessities even in recessions. In contrast, cyclical sectors (e.g. Banks, Autos, Energy) usually have beta above 1, amplifying market moves. Thus, a correlation analysis classifies Staples, Utilities, Healthcare, Telecom as “defensive” (lower correlation, more stable) and Tech, Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, Materials, Financials as “cyclical” or high-beta (move closely with economic swings). Defensive sectors’ lower correlation and volatility is evident in their performance during crises — they zig when the market zags, or at least fall less — which improves a portfolio’s Sharpe ratio when included. As SSGA notes, defensive segments occupy a “happy middle ground” of lower volatility and reasonable growth, offering protection against drawdowns while still participating in upside​ .
• Benchmarks: It’s useful to benchmark sectors against indexes like STOXX Europe 600 or MSCI Europe. Over the very long run, MSCI Europe’s total return (in EUR) has been boosted by dividends and the inclusion of all sectors. Defensive sectors have contributed strongly to these indexes’ returns despite their smaller weight. In fact, as of recent years, MSCI Europe is overweight Financials and Industrials (higher volatility sectors) and underweight Tech (relative to U.S.), which partly explains why MSCI Europe’s volatility (~15% Std Dev) isn’t low. However, carving out the low-volatility sectors shows that a “Defensive Europe” portfolio (just Staples, Utilities, Healthcare, etc.) would have had meaningfully lower volatility and similar returns to the broad index over decades — essentially a higher risk-adjusted return. Meanwhile, a “Cyclical Europe” portfolio (Financials, Energy, etc.) would have higher volatility and occasionally sharp drawdowns (e.g. the Eurozone crisis heavily hurt banks). Thus, compared to broad European market benchmarks, utilities and staples stand out as lower-risk bets without giving up performance, validating the essence of What Works on Wall Street in a European context.

Defensive vs. Growth Sectors: Stability in Recessions vs. Expansions

Are utilities and consumer staples truly the best long-term low-volatility sectors in Europe? Based on the evidence, they are certainly among the best, though one should also consider Healthcare (pharmaceuticals, medical devices) as another European defensive sector with strong long-term returns. Let’s break down defensive vs growth/cyclical sectors:

• Performance in Recessions: Defensive sectors earn their reputation during recessions and bear markets. As noted, they fall less and recover faster. Utilities provide essential services (electricity, water, etc.), so their revenues are relatively insulated from economic cycles. Consumer staples produce everyday goods (food, household products) for which demand is steady even in downturns. This was seen in 2008–2009 and 2020, when staples and utilities in Europe had milder declines while discretionary spending sectors and banks saw deep cuts. Empirical data shows defensive sectors often outperform the market on a relative basis during recessions​ . For example, if MSCI Europe was down –20% in a year, staples might be down only –5% or even flat, thus adding relative alpha in bad times. This defensive outperformance in bad years significantly boosts long-term compound returns (by avoiding large losses). As S&P data illustrated, during the worst global drawdowns, Staples and Healthcare held up best (smallest losses)​ .
• Performance in Bull Markets: In strong economic expansions or speculative bull runs, defensive sectors will lag high-growth areas. For instance, during the late-1990s tech boom, European tech and telecom shares skyrocketed, massively outperforming staid sectors like food & beverage or utilities for a few years. Similarly, in the post-2010 recovery, Tech and Consumer Discretionary (luxury goods, autos, etc., where Europe has global leaders) often led the market higher. Thus, growth/cyclical sectors can deliver higher short-term or medium-term returns when risk appetite is high. However, they do so with much higher volatility and tend to crash harder when the cycle turns. Over a full cycle, their excess gains are frequently offset by subsequent losses. The 2020–2021 rally (post-COVID) saw tech and cyclical rebound sharply, but by 2022, rising rates hit those sectors hard while staples/utilities kept much of their value. In contrast, utilities and staples exhibit more consistent, if unspectacular, gains during bull markets — they tend to climb steadily, but not as explosively as tech. For example, a utility stock might grind out +10% in a year when a tech stock is +30%, but in the next year if tech is –20%, the utility might be +5%. Defensive sectors thus underperform in frothy up-markets but preserve capital in down-markets — an appealing trade-off for many long-term investors.
• Dividend Stability and Payouts: A key component of defensive sector returns is dividends. Utilities and consumer staples companies typically have stable cash flows and high dividend payout ratios, returning a large share of earnings to shareholders​
  . Over decades, reinvested dividends constitute a large portion of total returns for these sectors. European utilities often carry dividend yields of 4–6%, and staples around 2–4%, which provide steady income and downside support (investors value the income stream, keeping prices more stable). These sectors’ dividends tend to be reliable and growing — for example, many utilities and staples have track records of maintaining or raising dividends even during economic contractions. “Utility companies often pay solid dividends quarter after quarter. Their consistency is an attribute during economic downturns…”​ . This dependable income makes them attractive “bond-like” equities and helps their total return compound, especially in low-rate environments when investors prize yield. Growth sectors, by contrast, usually pay minimal dividends (if any), relying purely on price appreciation which can be more volatile. Thus, from a Sortino ratio perspective (returns vs. downside deviation), the steady dividends and smaller drawdowns of staples/utilities result in far superior performance in “bad times” relative to growth sectors.
• Challengers to Staples/Utilities: It’s worth noting that Healthcare often rivals Staples as a defensive leader. Big European pharma companies (Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, etc.) have delivered strong long-term growth (due to innovation and aging demographics) while also being less volatile than the market. In O’Shaughnessy’s U.S. data, Healthcare had around 10.5% return with 23% volatility​ — not as low-vol as staples, but still defensive in nature. In Europe, healthcare has likewise been a top performer with moderate risk. Communication Services (telecom) is another traditionally defensive sector (people keep phone/internet service in recessions), but it has had unique challenges (high debt, tech disruption) — European telecom stocks underperformed in the long run despite moderate volatility. So utilities and staples remain the clearest examples of low-risk, decent-return sectors. Meanwhile, Technology stands at the opposite end: historically the most volatile. Interestingly, over the very long run, tech stocks globally only recently caught up in performance — as of 2009, they were the worst-performing sector historically​ , but a huge rally in the 2010s made tech one of the best performers of the last decade. In Europe, the tech sector’s smaller size meant its impact was limited, but certain tech names have done extremely well. Thus, the claim that Staples/Utilities are “best-performing” holds when adjusted for risk and across full market cycles, but pure price return leadership can shift in certain periods (e.g. tech in a boom). Still, from a conservative long-term investor’s perspective, utilities and staples offered the most consistent and safest path to equity growth, validating their reputations as the low-vol winners.

Image created using

Investment Implications for Long-Term Investors

Key Takeaways: Defensive sectors like consumer staples and utilities have indeed demonstrated the rare combination of low volatility, shallower drawdowns, and competitive long-term returns in Europe. This makes them attractive for investors with long horizons who seek growth with capital preservation. Historical analysis supports overweighting these sectors for a more defensive equity allocation: they have delivered equity-like returns with bond-like volatility. As a result, portfolios tilted toward staples/utilities (and healthcare) tend to have higher risk-adjusted returns (higher Sharpe ratios) than the broad market​ . That said, investors should be aware that in roaring bull markets these sectors may lag more cyclical areas — a diversified approach can balance stability and upside potential.

Defensive vs. Cyclical Positioning: For European investors, an emphasis on Staples and Healthcare (and to a degree Utilities) can provide resilience during downturns and steady compounding over time. These sectors are often dubbed “bond proxies” or “safe havens” and for good reason. In contrast, allocating to Financials, Energy, or Tech requires a higher risk tolerance and a timing element — they can boost returns when the cycle is favorable, but one must endure higher volatility and larger drawdowns. A prudent strategy may be to hold a core of defensive sectors for stability and add smaller allocations of cyclical sectors to capture upside in expansions. The data indicates that utilities and staples serve well as core defensive holdings — their downside protection can allow an investor to stay invested through bear markets (avoiding panic selling), which in turn enables realizing long-term gains.

Best-Performing European Sectors: Over a 50+ year perspective, Consumer Staples emerges as a standout sector for Europe-focused investors seeking strong, low-risk returns. It delivered high total returns (aided by dividend reinvestment) and proved remarkably durable across market environments​ . Healthcare is another high-performing, relatively defensive sector, benefiting from secular growth drivers and inelastic demand. Utilities, while often the lowest-volatility sector, typically delivered slightly lower absolute returns than staples/healthcare — but still respectable and with the highest certainty (least variance)​ . In risk-adjusted terms, utilities are hard to beat. Therefore, an investor prioritizing least downside risk above all might favor Utilities, whereas one looking for the best total return with still-low risk might favor Consumer Staples or Healthcare.

On the other hand, the data would caution against long-term over-allocation to historically volatile European sectors like Banks (Financials), Energy, or Materials unless one has a strong view on economic cycles. These sectors had the most severe losses in crises (e.g. banks in 2008, energy in the 2014–2016 oil crash)​ and their long-run returns, while sometimes high in boom periods, came with gut-wrenching swings. They also often faced structural headwinds (e.g. stricter regulations for banks, commodity price slumps for energy). Thus, for a “sleep-well-at-night” portfolio, the defensive sectors have been the wiser choice historically.

ETF and Index Fund Options: Investors can easily get exposure to these stable, high-performing sectors through sector index funds and ETFs. Some examples include:

• Consumer Staples: The MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Index is tracked by funds such as the SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (ticker: CSTP). This fund holds a basket of European staples giants (food, beverage, household product companies)​ . Another option is the Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Consumer Staples ETF, which tracks the STOXX 600 Staples sector. These provide diversified exposure to the steady growth and dividends of the staples sector.
• Utilities: For exposure to European utilities, one could use the iShares STOXX Europe 600 Utilities UCITS ETF (tracking the STOXX 600 Utilities index of electricity, gas, and water companies across Europe). There’s also an MSCI Europe Utilities index tracked by providers like Lyxor or SPDR. These funds yield relatively high income and capture the low-volatility profile of utility stocks.
• Healthcare: Healthcare is worth including as a defensive sector. The iShares STOXX Europe 600 Health Care ETF or the SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF give access to Europe’s pharmaceutical and medical leaders, combining defensive characteristics with growth potential from innovation.
• Broad Defensive Strategies: Investors seeking a one-stop solution might consider minimum-volatility or quality-factor funds. For example, the iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility ETF selects stocks (often from defensive sectors) that minimize risk. This kind of fund often ends up overweight staples and utilities by design. Similarly, a Dividend Aristocrats Europe ETF will tilt to sectors that consistently raise dividends (often staples, healthcare, utilities). These can be effective for those who want a rules-based defensive portfolio.
• Balanced Exposure: If one prefers not to sector-pick, simply ensuring your European equity allocation includes a healthy weight to staples and utilities (either via a value or defensive factor tilt, or by mixing broad market ETFs with sector ETFs) can improve stability. For instance, an investor could hold a broad STOXX 600 index fund and complement it with an overweight in a consumer staples ETF, to achieve a more defensive stance than the market. Academic and practitioner research suggests that such low-volatility strategies can deliver market-like returns with lower risk over time​ — essentially what staples/utilities have done.

Conclusion: The long-term, data-driven analysis affirms that in Europe, as in the U.S., Consumer Staples and Utilities have been among the most reliable sectors for investors, offering a potent mix of relatively high returns, low volatility, and reduced downside risk. This does not mean they will always beat every other sector in every period — leadership can rotate (for example, technology’s extraordinary run in recent years). However, over multi-decade periods and through numerous market cycles, the defensive sectors have proven their worth. They act as the portfolio’s ballast: steady in rough seas and still moving forward in calm waters. For long-term European investors, an allocation to these “boring” sectors has historically been a winning strategy — validating the essence of What Works on Wall Street on this side of the Atlantic. By focusing on companies that sell life’s necessities or provide essential services, one can build a portfolio that is both resilient and rewarding over time.

Sources:

1. O’Shaughnessy, J. What Works on Wall Street (4th ed.) — Sector Returns & Volatility 1967–2009​ .
2. State Street Global Advisors — Insights on Defensive Sectors and Volatility​
   .
3. S&P Dow Jones Indices — S&P Global 1200 Sector Indices Maximum Drawdowns​
   .
4. Morningstar / MSCI — MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Index and ETF info​
   .
5. Britannica Money — Utilities Sector Stability and Dividends​ .
6. SSGA Research — “Broadening Out from Tech” (Barbell strategy with defensives)​
   .
7. JPMorgan Asset Management — Guide to the Markets Europe (for broad index stats and sector performance trends)​
   . (Additional data consolidated in analysis)