Rebranded Oppression is Still Oppression
You’re watching it happen in real time
We love to believe we’d recognize history repeating itself — that if we were alive during the biggest civil rights battles, we’d be the ones standing on the right side — loud, unshakable, refusing to fall for the lies.
But history doesn’t come in black-and-white photos. It doesn’t wear the same clothes or use the same words. It learns. It adapts. It rebrands.
Right now, people think we’re having a new debate about DEI, voting rights, and education. But there’s nothing new about it. It’s the same game, played with different words.
They don't have to burn books if they can just ban them. They don’t have to say they’re against diversity if they can just call it “forced inclusion”. They don’t have to say they want to keep certain people out — they just say they’re protecting fairness.
It’s the same argument. Same fear. Same fight.
Same playbook. Different decade. And people are still falling for it.
1. The 1960s: fighting integration vs. fighting DEI
Do you know how they stopped desegregation? They didn’t say they hated black kids in schools. They weren’t racists, they swore. They just believed in states’ rights.
Sound familiar?
Because now, they don’t say they’re against diversity. They say they’re against “diversity mandates.” They don't say they don't want marginalized people in power. They say they’re just “fighting for a meritocracy.”
The packaging is slicker, the talking points are more polished. But underneath it? It’s still men — the powerful, the privileged — desperate to keep it that way.
2. The 1980s: the welfare queen myth vs “DEI is handouts”
Ronald Reagan needed people to hate social programs. So he told a story. A welfare queen, living off hardworking Americans.
It was a lie. . Because it wasn’t about facts. It was about fear.
And now? They used the same trick to kill DEI. They tell you unqualified people are getting unfair advantages. That white people are being discriminated against. That DEI is just handouts for the undeserving.
Same playbook. Different decade. Still trying to convince people the real problem isn’t at the top.
3. The 2000s: “religious freedom” vs. “parental rights”
It came dressed as “religious freedom.” It wasn’t about denying rights, they said — they just didn't want their kids exposed to it.
And now? . .
Not because they’re against equality, they say. Just because they believe in “parental rights.”
Rebranded oppression is still oppression.
If we don’t see the pattern, we’ll keep losing to it
Every generation, they find new words for the same fear. Every decade, they find new ways to dress up the same discrimination. Every time, they convince a fresh wave of people that this time, it's different.
It’s not different. It's not new.
You don’t have to wonder how history keeps repeating itself. You’re watching it happen in real-time.
For more stories about how inequality is perpetuated by the ruling class, follow Fourth Wave. Have you got a story or poem that focuses on women or other targeted groups? Submit to the Wave!
