Stay Cool To Win Races. How Do F1 Drivers Manage The Heat?

14 min read3 days ago

How military technology and NASCAR innovation are revolutionizing driver safety in the world’s most demanding motorsport

Picture this:

You’re strapped into a carbon fiber cockpit barely wider than your shoulders, wrapped head to toe in fireproof Nomex, surrounded by 1000-horsepower of screaming machinery generating enough heat to power a small town.

Outside, the Singapore sun beats down mercilessly, track temperatures soar past 60°C, and you’ve got to maintain razor-sharp focus for the next two hours while pulling forces that would make a fighter pilot wince.

Welcome to the glamorous world of Formula 1 — where looking cool is easy, but staying cool is a challenge.

For decades, F1 drivers have been motorsport’s equivalent of gladiators, enduring extreme conditions that would have most of us reaching for the nearest air conditioner.

But in a sport where milliseconds matter and every gram counts, the quest for driver cooling has become one of the most fascinating examples of technology trickling up the motorsport ladder rather than down.

The Sweat Lodge Years: F1’s Hot History

Let’s be honest — Formula 1 has never been known for mollycoddling its drivers. These are, after all, the same people who once raced with fuel tanks that could turn them into human torches, and engines that would regularly explode with the force of a small bomb.

Driver comfort was about as high on the priority list as comfortable pit lane catering (which, if you’ve ever eaten at a paddock, you’ll know isn’t saying much).

The early days of driver cooling in F1 were charmingly primitive. Ice packs stuffed into racing suits were the height of sophistication, though they had the unfortunate tendency to melt into uncomfortable puddles just when you needed them most.

Some enterprising drivers tried frozen bottles of water tucked into their suits, which worked brilliantly until they thawed and left them sitting in what felt suspiciously like they’d had an embarrassing accident.

The late Ayrton Senna was famously known to lose up to 4 kilograms of body weight during particularly grueling races — that’s nearly 9 pounds of pure sweat, enough to fill a decent-sized water bottle.

Michael Schumacher, never one to be outdone, was rumored to have his own cooling experiments, though Ferrari’s legendary secrecy meant we never learned if they involved dry ice, liquid nitrogen, or simply the power of Germanic stoicism.

As the sport evolved and safety became paramount, the FIA began to take driver welfare more seriously. The introduction of mandatory drinks systems was a start — though anyone who’s watched a driver struggle with a malfunctioning drink bottle mid-race knows these can be more hindrance than help.

Lewis Hamilton’s memorable “My drink is not working” complaint during the 2018 Singapore Grand Prix became an instant meme, but highlighted a very real problem: keeping hydrated in an F1 car is harder than it looks.

Learning from the Oval Office (and Battlefield)

Here’s where our story takes an unexpected turn. While F1 engineers were busy perfecting aerodynamics and hybrid power units, the real cooling innovation was happening in two unlikely places: NASCAR ovals and military battlefields.

Ice-based cooling vests first emerged in medical settings, helping patients undergoing lengthy procedures stay comfortable. The military, always quick to adapt civilian technology for more explosive purposes, adopted these systems for personnel operating in extreme environments — think desert operations where ambient temperatures could melt chocolate in your pocket.

Rini Technologies, established in the early 2000s, was developing portable cooling systems for military personnel dealing with chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) protection suits.

If you’ve ever wondered what it’s like wearing a full-body hazmat suit in 40-degree heat, imagine your worst fever dream and multiply by ten. Their Personal Cooling System (PCS) weighed just 1.8kg and could keep soldiers functioning in conditions that would otherwise require immediate medical evacuation.

NASCAR, meanwhile, was dealing with its own thermal challenges. Stock car racing might look like glorified highway driving to the uninitiated, but try maintaining concentration for 500 miles in a metal box with minimal airflow, surrounded by 40 other cars, with ambient temperatures routinely exceeding those found in most saunas.

Early NASCAR cooling solutions were about as sophisticated as a bag of ice duct-taped to the driver’s back — effective for about twenty minutes, then useless for the remaining four hours.

The breakthrough came when Chad Knaus, crew chief for Hendrick Motorsports, reached out to Rini Technologies looking for something to prevent his drivers from succumbing to heat stroke. This wasn’t just about comfort — heat exhaustion in a NASCAR race isn’t just dangerous, it’s potentially fatal when you’re traveling at 200mph surrounded by walls that don’t forgive mistakes.

Rini’s PCS-Auto, introduced in 2015, was a game-changer. Unlike its medical predecessor, it could be wired directly into a race car’s 12V electrical system, eliminating the need for separate batteries. More importantly, it actually worked for the duration of a race, maintaining consistent cooling without the weight penalties of ice-based systems.

The Trickle-Up Effect

This is where our story gets interesting from an F1 perspective. Usually, technology flows from Formula 1 downward — think carbon fiber, advanced aerodynamics, or hybrid power systems that eventually find their way into road cars. But driver cooling represents a rare reversal: grassroots innovation working its way up to the pinnacle of motorsport.

The success of compact cooling systems in NASCAR caught the attention of other series. IndyCar quickly adopted the technology when the Aeroscreen was introduced — that fighter jet-style canopy that protects drivers from debris but also creates a greenhouse effect that would make a orchid enthusiast jealous. The Rini Technologies PCS-Auto remains the only cooling system approved for the 2025 IndyCar rulebook, a testament to its effectiveness.

By 2019, the market had expanded enough to attract new players. Chillout Motorsports launched their Quantum cooler, a 5kg unit with a 24V micro rotary compressor that eliminated the need for ice entirely. While initially too heavy for top-level competition, it found immediate popularity in amateur racing circles where weight restrictions are more suggestions than commandments.

But Charles Kline, founder of Chillout Motorsports, had bigger ambitions. He could see the writing on the wall — or rather, the sweat stains on the racing suits. As climate change pushed global temperatures higher and F1 expanded into increasingly exotic (and hot) locations, driver cooling was going to become essential, not optional.

The F1 Challenge: Space, Weight, and Bureaucracy

Adapting cooling technology for Formula 1 isn’t like scaling up a recipe — it’s more like trying to fit a refrigerator into a matchbox while ensuring it meets safety standards written by the most paranoid engineers on the planet.

The FIA’s requirements for F1 cooling systems read like a fever dream of regulatory complexity. Current rules mandate that cooling systems operate on independent battery power, leading to a 5kg total weight allowance that must include everything from pumps to power packs. For context, 5kg in F1 terms is roughly equivalent to the weight difference between winning and finishing embarrassingly far down the field.

Chillout Motorsports’ current F1 system represents a masterpiece of miniaturization. The regular Cypher Pro system, designed for other racing series, packs a rotary micro compressor, evaporator, and condenser into an eight-inch enclosure. But F1’s space constraints make a sardine can look spacious, so the F1 version splits the condenser unit into the nose of the car, with refrigerant lines running to components mounted in areas like the sidepods.

The engineering challenge is immense. As Kline explains, “Right now, we’re doing bespoke systems to work with the current chassis, but for 2026, the teams will know from testing how much space they need to allocate for a modular system.” Currently, these split systems can have half their components in the sidepod and half in front of the pedal box — functional, but hardly elegant.

The installation complexity is staggering. These systems can only be charged with refrigerant once all components are connected, turning what should be a straightforward installation into a multi-hour engineering exercise. This becomes particularly problematic when cooling systems need to be mandated at short notice — sometimes just hours before a session if track temperatures exceed expectations.

The Shirt Off Their Backs (Literally)

Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of F1 cooling technology isn’t the high-tech refrigeration equipment, but the humble shirt that drivers wear. These aren’t your average undershirts — they’re marvels of engineering that contain approximately 50 meters of tubing to circulate chilled liquid and maintain core body temperature.

The development of FIA-approved cooling shirts represents a three-year odyssey through materials science hell. FIA regulations demand that any tubing on the outside of a shirt meet the same fire resistance requirements as the shirt itself. Previous versions essentially sandwiched tubing between two layers of fire-resistant material, creating what drivers diplomatically described as “like wearing a sweater” and less diplomatically refused to wear.

Kline and his team had to develop an entirely new compound for the tubing that could bend at both cold and high temperatures, maintain fire resistance for 15 seconds without melting or burning, and — here’s the kicker — be able to glue together reliably. “These materials do not like sticking together,” Kline notes with the weary tone of someone who’s spent too many sleepless nights in a chemistry lab.

The regulatory requirements extend beyond materials to safety features. Drivers need quick-release fittings in two different locations — one where the sewn-in tubing meets the external supply hose, and another at the interface with the car’s internal system.

The production process is labor-intensive to an almost artisanal degree. “We have 10 people on the project, but it takes all day to build one shirt,” Kline explains. “There’s eight to 10 hours of work in each one.” When demand spiked following FIA approval, with requests for hundreds of shirts before the 24 Hours of Dubai, Chillout had to limit quantities per customer because they could only produce 10–12 shirts per day.

The Chemistry Set: What’s Actually Flowing Through Those Tubes

The cooling liquid isn’t just water — it’s a carefully formulated cocktail designed for both performance and safety. The base mixture combines water with propylene glycol, chosen for its superior heat transfer properties and non-toxic nature (unlike ethylene glycol, which would turn a cooling system leak into a potential poisoning incident).

But here’s where it gets interesting: the mixture also contains methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) and methylisothiazolinone (MI) — preservatives commonly found in shampoo and body wash. In this context, they prevent microbial growth in the tubing and pump systems. Because nothing would ruin a driver’s day quite like discovering their cooling system had developed its own ecosystem.

The attention to detail extends to every component. The 24V pumps are rated for 150 hours of use, and Chillout ships spare units with every system to ensure teams can service their equipment without downtime. In a sport where a mechanical failure can cost millions in prize money and championship points, redundancy isn’t luxury — it’s survival.

Aerodynamic Battles and Bureaucratic Warfare

The integration of cooling systems into F1 cars creates fascinating conflicts between driver welfare and aerodynamic performance. Current test units pull air through ducts in the nose cone, using fans to direct airflow to the condenser. But every cubic centimeter of air diverted from aerodynamic purposes is a potential lap time penalty.

Teams are already working to minimize ductwork size, creating an ongoing negotiation between Chillout Motorsports and F1 aerodynamicists that resembles high-stakes diplomatic talks. The cooling system needs air to function; the aerodynamicists want that air for downforce and drag reduction.

NASCAR provides a cautionary tale of what happens when these negotiations go wrong. Teams discovered they could improve overall airflow numbers by placing mesh screens in ducts leading to cooling units — except this starved the coolers of airflow, leading to system failures. NASCAR eventually mandated that all cooling system diagrams be shared and published in their parts database, the regulatory equivalent of forcing everyone to show their homework.

The latest NASCAR rulebook includes wonderfully specific regulations about cooling system configurations, including the requirement that “all driver cooling assembly fans must be electrically and mechanically configured to only be capable of moving air from assembly intake(s) towards exhaust(s).” Translation: no clever engineers allowed to reverse airflow for aerodynamic advantage.

The 2026 Vision: Lighter, Faster, Cooler

Kline’s target for 2026 is ambitious: complete cooling systems weighing under 2kg — less than half the current weight. This isn’t just about making life easier for teams; it’s about making the technology so attractive that its adoption becomes inevitable rather than optional.

The goal is to package all components into modular units that can be installed and removed in under two hours. This would transform cooling systems from bespoke engineering exercises into plug-and-play solutions, making them practical for the rapid setup changes that characterize modern F1.

Kline envisions developing two or three standard variants, allowing teams to choose based on climate conditions and aerodynamic requirements. It’s a sensible approach that recognizes the different thermal challenges posed by Monaco’s tight streets versus the blast furnace of Bahrain or the humidity bath of Singapore.

The ultimate vision is regulatory standardization. Kline advocates for FIA mandates requiring teams to either install cooling systems or carry compensatory weight in the same location. This would level the playing field while encouraging adoption — the regulatory equivalent of making everyone eat their vegetables.

The Human Element: Why This Matters

Behind all this technology and regulation lies a simple truth: Formula 1 drivers are human beings operating at the absolute limits of physical and mental performance. Heat exhaustion doesn’t just slow lap times — it creates dangerous situations where split-second decisions can mean the difference between victory and catastrophe.

The expansion of F1’s calendar into increasingly challenging climates makes cooling technology not just desirable but essential. Races in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Middle Eastern venues routinely feature ambient temperatures exceeding 35°C, with track temperatures approaching levels that would be considered dangerous in other contexts.

Modern F1 drivers train like Olympic athletes, but no amount of fitness can fully prepare the human body for sustained exposure to extreme heat while maintaining the concentration required to pilot a 350km/h missile through traffic. Cooling systems represent the difference between drivers performing at their peak and merely surviving the experience.

The Cool Future

As I write this, the 2025 F1 season is showcasing the evolution of driver cooling technology in real-time. Teams are learning to integrate these systems into their operational procedures, drivers are adapting to new equipment, and engineers are refining designs based on real-world feedback.

The success of this technology transfer from military applications through NASCAR to Formula 1 represents something rare in motorsport: innovation driven by human welfare rather than pure performance. While F1 remains obsessed with finding every possible advantage, the cooling revolution demonstrates that sometimes the best performance comes from taking care of the most important component in the system — the driver.

Looking ahead, it’s easy to imagine a future where cooling systems are as standard as safety harnesses, where discussions about whether to run cooling equipment seem as antiquated as debates about wearing helmets. The technology exists, the regulatory framework is developing, and the human need is undeniable.

The real victory isn’t just keeping drivers cool — it’s proving that in a sport often criticized for prioritizing spectacle over safety, sometimes the most important innovations are the ones that simply let heroes remain human.

And in a world where temperatures continue rising and F1 continues expanding globally, that might be the coolest innovation of all.

After all, it’s hard to look cool when you’re overheating — but with 50 meters of tubing and some military-grade engineering, F1 drivers might just manage both.

Be the first one to receive exclusive and fascinating Formula 1 stories as soon as those are published

If you liked reading this story, you might like these too.

⭐Can F1’s Synthetic Fuel Gamble Pay Off?

⭐The DRS Dilemma: F1’s Controversial Overtaking Band-Aid

⭐Formula One’s V6 Power Units Are Not So Bad

⭐All You Ever Wanted To Know About the Formula 1 Driver Seat

⭐Flavio Briatore’s Last Dance in Formula 1

⭐Follow the Money: F1’s Calendar Revolution and the Death of European Dominance

⭐DRS and Drama: Charlie Whiting’s Legacy

⭐Is George Russell Ready To Lead Mercedes?

⭐Williams F1: The Turbo Era and the Rise of the FW10

⭐Racing Against Time: Why Aspiring F1 Drivers Face an Uphill Climb