Marvel, We have a Villain Problem.

When the dust settled after Avengers: Endgame, Marvel Studios stood victorious, basking in the glow of a decade of box office domination. Thanos, the Mad Titan, had snapped his way into cinematic history as one of the greatest villains ever to grace the silver screen. Fans cheered, cried, and threw their popcorn at the screen as our beloved heroes triumphed against a purple guy who was somehow more intimidating than a galactic warlord had any right to be.

But now? Well, Marvel seems to have a new nemesis. And no, it’s not another cosmic entity bent on universal destruction or a morally complex anti-hero with daddy issues. This time, it’s a far more insidious foe — their own villains.

Let’s be real. In the early days of the MCU, the bad guys weren’t just plot devices; they were integral to why we kept showing up. Loki was the mischievous trickster we loved to hate (and eventually just love). Killmonger wasn’t just a villain; he was a debate we were all having. And then, of course, there was Thanos, whose genocidal tendencies were somehow relatable, which is disturbing but… impressive?

Fast-forward to Phase 4, and we’re left wondering: what happened to the memorable villains? When you can barely remember the name of the villain from Black Widow (Task-something?) or shrug off the fact that the God Butcher in Thor: Love and Thunder was about as terrifying as a bad haircut, there’s clearly a problem.

Marvel, we’ve stuck with you through a lot. We’ve forgiven Thor: The Dark World, we’ve overlooked Iron Man 3’s twist villain debacle, and we even pretended The Falcon and the Winter Soldier had a villain worth caring about. But now? The villain problem is harder to ignore. It’s like watching Loki continuously “die” and come back — eventually, it just loses its edge.

Because here’s the thing: without a villain worth caring about, the stakes crumble, and so does the magic. We’re not asking for another Thanos-level event just yet. But could we at least get a baddie who isn’t out-acted by their own CGI?

The Golden Age of Marvel Villains: When Bad Guys Were Good

In the early days of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, villains weren’t just obstacles for heroes to punch through — they were catalysts for emotional and narrative depth. Loki (Tom Hiddleston) wasn’t just the mischievous god of chaos; he was Thor’s brother, driven by a deep-seated inferiority complex and a desire to prove himself. His betrayal hurt because it was personal, not just for Thor but for the audience, who saw his constant internal conflict.

Then there was Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan) in Black Panther. Here was a villain whose motivations were not only understandable but rooted in real-world social and political issues. Killmonger wasn’t fighting for domination or revenge — he was seeking justice for the oppressed, and in some ways, he wasn’t even wrong. His radical methods clashed with T’Challa’s ideals, but his argument was powerful enough that audiences could empathize with his cause. When he delivers the line, “Bury me in the ocean with my ancestors who jumped from ships, because they knew death was better than bondage,” you feel it in your bones. That’s not just a villain — that’s a movement.

And who could forget Thanos? For a decade, the MCU carefully teased the Mad Titan, building him up into an unstoppable force that culminated in Avengers: Infinity War and Endgame. Thanos wasn’t just some two-dimensional megalomaniac; he was a fully-realized character with a twisted but coherent philosophy. His desire to wipe out half the universe wasn’t born from a thirst for power, but from his belief that it was the only way to save the universe from itself. The fact that we understood him — maybe even agreed with him at times — made him terrifying.

These villains worked because they were given time to develop, both in terms of screen presence and narrative build-up. They had complex motivations, and their goals challenged the heroes on a deeper level than just physical confrontation. This is what made the early MCU so compelling: the villains were an essential part of the story, not just a final boss to be dispatched in the third act.

Phase 4 and the Rise of Forgettable Foes

As Marvel’s storytelling has expanded, its villains have lost some of the nuance that made earlier antagonists so compelling. In Phase 4, we’ve seen a string of forgettable villains, like Taskmaster (Black Widow) and Gorr (Thor: Love and Thunder), whose potential was sacrificed for the sake of fast-paced plot progression. These characters feel more like footnotes than meaningful challenges to the heroes.

Take Taskmaster, for instance. In the comics, Taskmaster is an intriguing character — a skilled mercenary with the ability to replicate any fighting style. But in Black Widow, Taskmaster’s depth is lost in a weak twist and underdeveloped backstory. The villain’s reveal comes too late, and by then, there’s not enough investment in her journey to care about her fate. Similarly, Gorr, played by Christian Bale, promised to be a terrifying villain with emotional complexity. But instead of exploring his tragic backstory as the God Butcher, the film glosses over it, reducing him to a mere shadow of the menacing figure he could have been.

This trend of underutilized villains isn’t just a Phase 4 problem — it’s a result of oversaturation. With Marvel pumping out movies and Disney+ series at breakneck speed, there’s little room for meaningful character development. Audiences are expected to keep up with a rapidly expanding universe, often at the cost of deeper narratives. The result is a slew of villains who serve more as plot devices than fully realized characters.

Villain Motive Problems: When Evil Feels Shallow

Another issue plaguing Marvel’s recent villains is their lack of compelling motivations. Earlier villains like Loki, Killmonger, and Thanos were successful because their actions were rooted in deep personal conflicts. Loki’s jealousy of Thor drove his chaos. Killmonger’s fight for justice made him a mirror to T’Challa’s more reserved approach. Thanos, despite his genocidal plans, believed he was genuinely saving the universe.

In contrast, recent villains like Dreykov (Black Widow) and Malekith (Thor: The Dark World) are underwhelming because their goals are underexplored. Dreykov is portrayed as a generic villain with a basic power-hungry motive, while Malekith’s desire to plunge the universe into darkness lacks any emotional or philosophical depth. Without strong motivations, these characters become forgettable roadblocks rather than worthy adversaries for our heroes.

This isn’t just a problem for individual films — it also affects the overall stakes of the MCU. A villain’s purpose isn’t just to challenge the hero physically but to test them emotionally and ideologically. When a villain lacks motivation, the hero’s victory feels hollow, leaving the audience unfulfilled. Villains like Thanos worked because they weren’t just punching bags; they were philosophical opponents that forced the heroes to question their own beliefs.

Overreliance on CGI and Spectacle

In addition to weak motivations, recent Marvel villains have suffered from an overreliance on CGI and visual effects. Spectacle has always been a part of the MCU, but earlier films balanced action with strong character moments. In contrast, newer villains are often reduced to massive CGI creatures or beings, robbing them of their humanity and emotional weight.

Take Dormammu (Doctor Strange) or Surtur (Thor: Ragnarok), for instance. These visually impressive cosmic threats feel more like abstract obstacles than true villains. They’re too big, too detached, and too reliant on digital effects to feel like characters with meaningful motivations. While clever, the final battle between Doctor Strange and Dormammu lacks emotional stakes because the villain is little more than a giant floating head.

Even more grounded villains like Ultron (Avengers: Age of Ultron) fall into this trap. Despite James Spader’s excellent voice work, Ultron is buried under layers of CGI and quippy one-liners, making it difficult to take him seriously as a real threat. When villains become indistinguishable from the CGI spectacles surrounding them, their presence fades, and the audience disengages from their story.

MCU’s Villains on Disney+: A Missed Opportunity

Marvel’s expansion into television through Disney+ has opened up new opportunities to explore complex characters over multiple episodes. However, when it comes to villains, this potential is often wasted. Shows like WandaVision and The Falcon and the Winter Soldier introduced promising antagonists, but their arcs were often rushed or undermined by unsatisfying conclusions.

In WandaVision, Agatha Harkness starts as an intriguing, manipulative villain, cleverly pulling strings behind the scenes. But by the time her true motives are revealed, the show pivots to a standard superhero battle that undercuts the psychological tension built up over the series. The same can be said for The Falcon and the Winter Soldier’s Karli Morgenthau, whose Flag Smashers had the potential to be a nuanced commentary on political extremism. Instead, her motivations were muddled, and her arc ended abruptly without the emotional payoff the show had been building toward.

Even Loki, a show centered on one of Marvel’s best villains, ends up sidelining the titular character’s complexity to set up future multiverse plots. Kang’s introduction at the end of the series hints at a larger, more terrifying threat, but it’s presented more as a teaser than a satisfying narrative conclusion.

How Marvel Can Fix Its Villain Problem

Marvel’s villain problem is fixable, but it will require a shift in focus. Here’s how they can bring back the compelling antagonists we’ve been missing:

1. Prioritize Character Development Over Spectacle: Marvel needs to slow down and give its villains more room to breathe. Characters like Kang and Doctor Doom have the potential to be great, but they need the same careful development that made Thanos such an iconic threat.
2. Fewer Projects, More Focus: The oversaturation of Marvel content has made it harder for individual stories — and villains — to stand out. Reducing the number of films and series each year could give writers more time to develop meaningful, character-driven narratives.
3. Return to Philosophical Conflicts: The best Marvel villains force heroes to confront deeper moral questions. Marvel should move away from generic world-ending threats and return to villains with clear, complex motivations that challenge the protagonists in unexpected ways.

If Marvel can address these issues, the MCU may once again deliver villains that are as compelling as the heroes they oppose. Because, as much as we love a good superhero, the story is only as good as the villain who challenges them.

Follow @criticish on Instagram for more updates!