Member-only story
9/11
Inconvenient Facts That Refuse to Die
For something as historically massive and world-changing as the September 11 attacks, you’d think we’d have a clean, airtight narrative by now. More than two decades later, questions still pile up, not just from conspiracy theorists in basements.
These are glaring inconsistencies, weird coincidences, and head-scratching “miracles” that never got satisfying answers. Yet every time someone asks about them, they’re met with eye rolls or gaslighting.
For this article, I’m sticking to only the facts; I’m not including any “conspiracy theories”, just what is documented as fact and hasn’t been debunked.
If we’re going to swallow the “official story” whole, we should at least acknowledge the parts that still taste off.
You know what has better surveillance than Fort Knox? The Pentagon. You’d think if a commercial airliner slammed into the Department of Defense in broad daylight, we’d have crystal-clear footage from a dozen angles. But what did we get? A few frames from a grainy security camera that look like they were shot on a 1998 Nokia. No visible wings, no fuselage, just a fireball and a puff of smoke.
Where’s the rest of the footage? Are we really supposed to believe that the most secure building in America didn’t catch the strike on video? If they…
